NGO Joint Statement: Co-firing of Biomass in Coal Plants or Conversion of Coal Power Plants to Dedicated Biomass Power Plants is Greenwashing

Sydney Jones

Press Secretary

[email protected]

Carole Mitchell

Global Communications Director

[email protected]

Biomass accelerates climate change and destroys forest ecosystems

11 April 2023

 In Japan, the co-firing of biomass in coal power plants and conversion of coal-fired power plants to biomass are currently taking place at a rapid pace. Already 31 coal-fired units, or about half of the coal-fired power plants of major power utilities, are co-firing with biomass.[1] At least 40 of the renewable energy feed-in-tariff (FIT) approved biomass power projects are at coal power plants, and 35 of these plants are designated as “inefficient” (sub-critical or super-critical).[2] Biomass co-firing for industrial self-generation at in-house coal-fired power plants and other power plants is also part of Japan’s “Green Transformation” (GX) policy.[3]

Wood pellets are one of the primary biomass fuels used for biomass co-firing at coal plants. With the increase in biomass power generation under the FIT program, imports of wood pellets have increased 61-fold over the past decade to approximately 4.41 million tons in 2022.[4] As the power generation capacity of coal-fired power plants is generally much larger than that of dedicated biomass power plants, further increases in wood pellet imports are expected as biomass co-firing is promoted at coal-fired power plants.[5] This increase in demand for wood pellets is nothing short of an additional burden on forests, whether directly or indirectly.

The undersigned environmental NGOs working on climate change and forest issues, oppose biomass co-firing and the conversion of coal power plants to dedicated biomass power plants for the following reasons:

  1. Accelerates climate change:
    • Burning biomass emits CO2: 
      • Biomass power generation is thermal power generation, and the combustion of biomass fuels emits large amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere. Even though the carbon emission coefficient of wood is greater than that of coal,[6] the Japanese government considers it to be “carbon neutral” and does not account for CO2 emissions from combustion.[7] Moreover, when forests are cleared to produce biomass fuels, the carbon that the forests have stored in the trees and soil over a long period of time is released into the atmosphere. There is no guarantee that cleared forests will recover to their original state, and even if they do, it will take decades to centuries to completely restore the CO2 released into the atmosphere. In addition to this, CO2 derived from fossil fuel use is generated at each stage of harvesting, processing, and transportation. Japan relies on imports for most of its wood pellets,[8] which emits large amounts of GHGs during transportation. To regard biomass power generation as “carbon neutral,” ignoring the CO2 emissions throughout its lifecycle, the years required for forests recovery and the possibility that forests will not recover, is a great risk that will accelerate climate change.
    • Prolonging the life of coal-fired power stations:
      • In order to meet the Paris Agreement’s 1.5 ℃ target, OECD countries need to phase out coal-fired power by 2030. However, Japan’s Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) uses a formula that deducts the biomass inputs for co-firing from coal inputs, which enables inefficient coal power plants to appear efficient and thereby extend their lives.[9]
      • An expert has estimated that the CO2 emission coefficient for a coal-fired power plant without biomass co-firing is 0.84kg-CO2/kWh, while it increases to 0.85kg-CO2/kWh when a coal-fired plant with 38% power generation efficiency co-fires 5% biomass.[10] In addition, the conversion or retrofitting of coal-fired power plants to dedicated biomass combustion is being considered,[11] in which case the CO2 emission coefficient would be 1.03 kg-CO2/kWh.
  1. Destroys forest ecosystems:
    • Prolonging the life of coal-fired power stations: 
      • Most of the woody biomass fuel used for large-scale biomass power generation as well as biomass co-firing coal-fired power generation is imported from Southeast Asia and North America.[12] Future attempts to supply large quantities of biomass fuels will increase pressure for deforestation. The impacts caused by biomass fuels production on ecosystems, such as deforestation, forest degradation, and biodiversity loss, is immeasurable. Cases have been reported of natural forests, including primary forests in North America, being cleared to produce woody biomass fuels. It is not easy for destroyed forest ecosystems to restore their function, and it is impossible for them to recover to a qualitatively equivalent ecosystem. The guidelines for developing project plans under the FIT subsidy program do not have clear standards for the sustainability of woody biomass fuels, and any such standards are not applied to non-FIT biomass power generation. Biomass power generation threatens ecosystems and biodiversity, and undermines the very concept of renewable energy, which is intended to reduce the burden on the environment.

Hereby, we urge the Japanese government to take following measures:

  • Achieve a coal exit as soon as possible, regardless of biomass co-firing.
  • Do not support biomass co-firing or dedicated biomass power plants.
  • Exclude biomass power generation that uses fuels other than waste from the definition of renewable energy. and do not provide subsidies or other support.
  • Require that CO2 emissions from biomass combustion be accounted for at the power plant level.
  • Count CO2 emissions from biomass combustion by the consuming country and incorporate this into their carbon accounting.

 

Signatories (90 organizations)

Friends of the Earth Japan

Japan

Greenpeace Japan

Japan

HUTAN Group

Japan

Kiko Network

Japan

Global Environmental Forum

Japan

Japan Tropical Forest Action Network

Japan

Istitute for Sustainable Energy Policies

Japan

Japan Center for a Sustainable Environment and Society

Japan

Climate Action Network Japan(CAN-Japan)

Japan

Citizens Alliance for Saving the Atmosphere and the Earth (CASA)

Japan

A SEED JAPAN

Japan

350.org Japan

Japan

Forests, Climate and Biomass Working Group – Environmental Paper Network

International

Mighty Earth

USA

350 Eugene

USA

350 Triangle

USA

AbibiNsroma Foundation

Ghana

Australian Forests and Climate Alliance

Australia

Biofuelwatch

UK/USA

Blue Dalian

China

Castlemaine Residents Against Biomass

Australia

Center for Biological Diversity

USA

Central California Environmental Justice Network

USA

Coast Range Association

USA

Coastal Plain Conservation Group

USA

Comite Schone Lucht | Clean Air Committee NL

Netherlands

Community Partners Across the South

USA

Conservation North

Canada

Consumers’ Association of Penang

Malaysia

De Bomenbond

Netherlands

De Klimaatcoalitie

Netherlands

Doctors and Scientists Against Wood Smoke Pollution (DSAWSP)

USA

Dogwood Alliance

USA

Earth Action, Inc.

USA

Earth Neighborhood Productions

USA

EARTHDAY.ORG

USA

EDSP ECO

Netherlands

Endangered Species Coalition

USA

Environment East Gippsland inc

Australia

EPIC- Environmental Protection Information Center

USA

Federatie tegen Biomassacentrales

Netherlands

Fern

EU

FIAN Sri Lanka

Sri Lanka

Forest Watch Indonesia

Indonesia

Forum Ökologie & Papier

Germany

Friends of the Clearwater

USA

Friends of the Earth US

USA

Gippsland Environment Group

Australia

Global Justice Ecology Project

USA

Great Old Broads for Wilderness, Cascade-Volcanoes Chapter

United States

Green Cove Defense Committee

USA

Green Longjiang

China

Green Snohomish

USA

Himalaya Niti Abhiyan

India

Hunter Knitting Nannas

Australia

Independent Forestry Monitoring Network (JPIK)

Indonesia

John Muir Project

USA

Kaoem Telapak

Indonesia

Kitsap Environmental Coalition

USA

Landelijk Netwerk Bossen- en Bomenbescherming

Netherlands

Leefmilieu

Netherlands

Maíra Institute

Brazil

Natural Resources Defense Council

USA

Nature Nova Scotia

Canada

NC Climate Solutions Coalition

United States

No Electricity from Forests

Australia

Ole Siosiomaga Society Incorporated (OLSSI)

Samoa

Pakaid

Pakistan

Partnership for Policy Integrity

USA

Pivot Point

USA

Fridays For Future Sendai Japan

Profundo

Netherlands

River coalition

Czech Republic

Sahabat Alam Malaysia (Friends of the Earth)

Malaysia

Save Estonia’s Forests (Päästame Eesti Metsad)

Estonia

Scholar Tree Alliance

China

Snow Alliance

China

Solutions for Our Climate

South Korea

South East Region Conservation Alliance (SERCA)

Australia

Southern Environmental Law Center

USA

Spruill Farm Conservation Project

USA

Southern Forests Conservation Coalition

USA

Stand.earth

Canada

Standing Trees

USA

Sunflower Alliance

USA

The Corner House

UK

Thurston Climate Action Team

USA

Trend Asia

Indonesia

Utah Physicians for a Healthy Environment

USA

Wild Nature Institute

USA

WOLF Forest protection movement

Slovakia

 


[1] The Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI), Outline of Interim Report of the Working Group to Study Coal-fired Power Plants, p.27, <https://www.meti.go.jp/shingikai/enecho/denryoku_gas/denryoku_gas/sekitan_karyoku_wg/20210423_report.html>

[2] Prepared by FoE Japan based on the data from the website of the Agency for Natural Resources and Energy and the database of Japan Beyond Coal (See Appendix 1

[3] METI, ‘Embodiment of Policy Initiatives to Realise GX’, p.29, p.31, p.33 <https://www.meti.go.jp/shingikai/sankoshin/sangyo_gijutsu/green_transformation/pdf/011_01_00.pdf>

[4] The Ministry of Finance, ‘Trade Statistics’ (See Appendix 2)

[5] J-Power, a major Japanese coal-fired power utility company, and Enviva, a world leading wood pellets manufacturing company in the U.S., signed a memorandum of understanding to jointly establish a system producing and supplying 5 million tons of wood pellets annually. <https://www.jpower.co.jp/english/news_release/pdf/news211117e.pdf>

[6] Center for Global Environmental Research, National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report of JAPAN 2022, p.3-16 <https://www.nies.go.jp/gio/archive/nir/jqjm10000017uzyw-att/NIR-JPN-2022-v3.0_GIOweb.pdf>

[7] The GHG Protocol and SBTi, which are the global standard for corporate GHG emissions calculation and reporting methods, require that CO2 emissions from biomass used for energy to be reported as corporate emissions.

  1. i) World Business Council for Sustainable Development, World Resources Institute, ‘ The Greenhouse Gas Protocol -A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard, Revised Edition’ , p.63, <https://ghgprotocol.org/sites/default/files/standards/ghg-protocol-revised.pdf>
  2. ii) Science Based Targets Initiative, SBTI corporate net zero standards, p.24 <https://www.env.go.jp/earth/ondanka/supply_chain/gvc/files/tools/Net-Zero-Standard_v1.0_jp.pdf>

[8] The Ministry of Finance, ‘Trade Statistics’ and the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, ‘Survey of Production Statistics on Special Forest Products’ (See Appendix 3)

[9] METI, Outline of Interim Report of the Working Group to Study Coal-fired Power Plants, p.1, <https://www.meti.go.jp/shingikai/enecho/denryoku_gas/denryoku_gas/sekitan_karyoku_wg/20210423_report.html>

[10] Global Environmental Forum, Reference ‘CO2 emissions from biomass power plants’ provided at the webinar ‘In the shadow of “Carbon Neutral” -CO2 emissions from biomass power generation and coal co-firing’, p.6, <https://www.gef.or.jp/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/bbd4731754105f73e348ee35cca7119c.pdf>

[11] METI, Reference 4 ‘Securing Investment in Power Sources’, p.28 <https://www.meti.go.jp/shingikai/enecho/denryoku_gas/denryoku_gas/seido_kento/061.html>

[12] The amount of waste biomass in Japan is limited and most of it has already been used.

14/Nov/2024
Palm Oil Report 46
14/Nov/2024
European Parliament guts and delays EUDR
11/Nov/2024
It’s make or break for European zero deforestation law